the dreams that you dare to...
Sitting here, listening to a hollow (and somewhat haunting actually) cover of Somewhere Over the Rainbow by some overweight Hawaiian fellow, I can't bring myself to read my so called objective sociology text book. Is this because I'm lazy? Yes and no. It's mainly because I'm lazy but at least, oh, I don't know, 22% of the reason I'm not reading is because the book was written by jackasses.
Since I'm writing this simply for my own amusement, I don't feel that I need to start at any particular place nor do I feel I have to form any sort of coherent argument. In fact, I'll probably end up just insulting the authors. For example, D. Stanley Eitzen - that guy can go pound sand up his ass. His parents probably never married and I bet he's got a stupid look on his face most of the time. Maxine Baca Zinn sucks too.
The problem I find with this book is that they give you a whole spiel about subjective and objective reasoning but are then about as objective as my ass (yeah, go ahead and try to make sense out of that).
This book couldn't be anymore liberal if it tried. I'm not some scary conservative though, don't get me wrong, but what I'm getting from the text is basically this: "Fuck darwin and everything he had to say, fuck him in his stupid ass. The rich suck because they have money and I don't care if it resulted from a perfectly logical set of circumstances. The poor have it rough and it's the system's fault and we need to do everything we can to help them no matter the cost. Oh, and fuck the constitution while we're at it."
They don't put it quite like that but you know... "Government must enforce prohibitions against disinvestment in the city."
What the fuck is that. Every solution they come up with is simply another restriction put in place. More spending and more spending. That's all they can come up with?
http://www.lp.org/
So, I tried to write this before my song finished. Didn't happen and having reread it now, I see that I didn't even begin to make a point. Damn. There's a nice link there to the LIbertarian website though. I suppose if you want some actual information you should try there.
Note to self: Try to make sense in next post. Cut down on caffeine.
Since I'm writing this simply for my own amusement, I don't feel that I need to start at any particular place nor do I feel I have to form any sort of coherent argument. In fact, I'll probably end up just insulting the authors. For example, D. Stanley Eitzen - that guy can go pound sand up his ass. His parents probably never married and I bet he's got a stupid look on his face most of the time. Maxine Baca Zinn sucks too.
The problem I find with this book is that they give you a whole spiel about subjective and objective reasoning but are then about as objective as my ass (yeah, go ahead and try to make sense out of that).
This book couldn't be anymore liberal if it tried. I'm not some scary conservative though, don't get me wrong, but what I'm getting from the text is basically this: "Fuck darwin and everything he had to say, fuck him in his stupid ass. The rich suck because they have money and I don't care if it resulted from a perfectly logical set of circumstances. The poor have it rough and it's the system's fault and we need to do everything we can to help them no matter the cost. Oh, and fuck the constitution while we're at it."
They don't put it quite like that but you know... "Government must enforce prohibitions against disinvestment in the city."
What the fuck is that. Every solution they come up with is simply another restriction put in place. More spending and more spending. That's all they can come up with?
http://www.lp.org/
So, I tried to write this before my song finished. Didn't happen and having reread it now, I see that I didn't even begin to make a point. Damn. There's a nice link there to the LIbertarian website though. I suppose if you want some actual information you should try there.
Note to self: Try to make sense in next post. Cut down on caffeine.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home